AD #3547 – Xpeng Copying Tesla Architecture; Mid-Size Ram EV Almost Certain; BMW Reveals Most-Powerful EV

April 17th, 2023 at 11:52am

Audio-only version:
Listen to “AD #3547 – Xpeng Copying Tesla Architecture; Mid-Size Ram EV Almost Certain; BMW Reveals Most-Powerful EV” on Spreaker.

Follow us on social media:

Instagram Twitter Facebook

Runtime:9:36

0:00 Indonesia Gets More EV Investment
0:44 Porsche Sales Up, But EVs Down
1:26 Xpeng Copying Tesla Architecture
3:00 VW Pulls Camo Off ID.7
4:23 Lancia Concept Hints At Its Next 10 Years
5:34 Volvo Increases Rear Seat Luxury
7:01 i7 M70 is BMW’s Most-Powerful EV
7:59 Ram Leaves Little Doubt About Mid-Size EV

Visit our sponsors to thank them for their support of Autoline Daily: Bridgestone, Intrepid Control Systems, and Schaeffler.

»Subscribe to Podcast |

5661 rss-logo-png-image-68050 stitcher-icon youtube-logo-icon-65475

Thanks to our partner for embedding Autoline Daily on its website: WardsAuto.com

30 Comments to “AD #3547 – Xpeng Copying Tesla Architecture; Mid-Size Ram EV Almost Certain; BMW Reveals Most-Powerful EV”

  1. kevin A Says:

    With Ferrari now on it’s own, shouldn’t Stellantis develop a replacement? I don’t see Maserati expanding their model range to fill the gap or Alpha Romeo’s models growing in size to fill the gap either. Is there a place for Lancia there? I could see a reborn Lancia Stratos for Italy, while also being sold as an Opel GT in Germany and a performance Citroen to fight Alpine in the French market. With a bigger motor, it could even be an Alpha Romeo. What do you think?

  2. Wim van Acker Says:

    @1 Ferrari is not on its own: 25% of Ferrari is owned by EXOR N.V., controlled by the Agnelli family, which is also heavily invested in Stellantis.

  3. Wim van Acker Says:

    @1,2 the influence of the Agnelli family is significant: John Elkann is Chairman of the Ferrari Board of Directors and he has appointed Ferrari’s CEO Benedetto Vigna.

  4. Lambo2015 Says:

    So Ram is going to create a truck to compete with its own Jeep Gladiator? Personally, I think they would be better off to go after the Ford Mavrick and Santa Cruz go a bit smaller than mid-size but even if they did both they will probably sell okay.

  5. Drew Says:

    Caution – opinion to follow… That BMW i7 is super ugly.

  6. Drew Says:

    Caution – opinion to follow… That BMW i7 is super ugly.

  7. Kit Gerhart Says:

    4 Wouldn’t there be a market for an actual smaller pickup truck? You know, 2 doors, one row of seating, and a 7 or 8 foot box? No one has that, and I’d think there would be a market, especially with an efficient gas powertrain like Maverick hybrid. An EV would be ok too, for local use by “handymen.”

  8. Wim van Acker Says:

    @5 I was thinking the same, what an ugly vehicle. It may be appealing in the Chinese and Middle Eastern markets, though.

  9. GM Veteran Says:

    I agree, Drew. There was a time when BMW was a sporting, luxury brand with refined styling. Each new model seems to be an styling experiment. The front fascias in particular keep getting more crowded with odd looking tidbits, strange angles and openings that all may or may not have an actual purpose.

  10. GM Veteran Says:

    Caution all players: be careful not to mix up the two segments of the name of that Lancia concept!

  11. Drew Says:

    Did BMW rehire Chris Bangle?

  12. ArtG Says:

    Where’s Chris Bangle now that we really need him?

  13. Sean McElroy Says:

    @Lambo – In the September report, Ram’s CEO said he also wanted to test the waters with the smaller and all-new version of Ram 1200. However, there’s challenges with taxes and homologation with that exact model because it’s going to built in Brazil.

  14. Ziggy Says:

    7 +++++++++++++++++

  15. Ed Mattingly Says:

    What I think makes several BMW models ugly is the new grill; two side by side grills shaped sorta like stop signs

  16. Ed Mattingly Says:

    What I think makes several BMW models ugly is the new grill; two side by side grills shaped sorta like stop signs

  17. Ed Mattingly Says:

    What I think makes several BMW models ugly is the new grill; two side by side grills shaped sorta like stop signs

  18. Ed Mattingly Says:

    What I think makes several BMW models ugly is the new grill; two side by side grills shaped sorta like stop signs

  19. wmb Says:

    @4 & 13.) A Ram midsize vehicle and compact would be great, especially the compact. IMHO, the compact may be better coming first, since they could beat some of the others to market, with the other focused on their midsize pickup BEV. It would close to one of their compact CUVs, so much of the development may mostly be done. Then they could turn to their midsize truck! I don’t think that the Gladiator would see much cross showing, unless they did a TRX version.

  20. Kit Gerhart Says:

    The Bangled BMWs looked pretty good compared to most of their recent stuff.

  21. wmb Says:

    While I love BMWs (but will never be able to afford), their current styling/exterior design motif is hard to look at, but, the hardest thing to let go of, is their BEV vehicle range! It makes no since to me, that Mercedes and BMW would be OK with the luxury upstart Lucid and the premium automaker Tesla, both have EVs with greater range AND horsepower, then their M and AMG sporting divisions! The fact that the M7 in today’s report, gets about 250 miles of range is sad!

  22. Merv Says:

    20 that is so true. He left and they got even more unpleasant

  23. Drew Says:

    I disliked the Bangle BMWs. The new BMWs seem to be trying to unseat the Bangle era for the ugliest BMWs.

  24. wmb Says:

    Again on the i7M, as big and filled out as it is (flat floor) and the battery pack still doesn’t have as much usable storage/power as either the Model S or Air. I get that the Plaid and Sapphire use three motors, yet they also get 400+ miles of range, too! I think this is a clear case, as John Mc says, where scar tissue is hurting this model. While Genesis was able to make it work when they retrofit it the ICE version of the G80, to its EV sibling, the ICE and EV versions of the 7-Series, does not seem to be as successful. While the EQS/EQE might not have the range and power of Tesla and Lucids, having gone with a ground up, clean sheet approach for the EVs , they have been able to hit closer to their targets and only need to make incremental updates and changes to better align themselves with the leaders of the pack! While neither Licud and Tesla comes close to the appointments and boutique status of either Mercedes or BMW, their offerings may be good enough to make potential buyers think twice. Don’t get me wrong, either OEM will not be able to build the new i7 and EQS fast enough to me demand. Yet, IMHO, their shortcomings may have given these two upstart competitors, a bigger opportunity convent more then a few of their loyal fan.

  25. Kit Gerhart Says:

    24 So far, EVs are mainly commuter cars for those with home charging, so does range matter much?

  26. Kit Gerhart Says:

    23. I agree.

  27. Bob Wilson Says:

    About the ‘mega factory’ sites story, the solution is a deep basement and upper floors. Build up and down but if they can’t make cars anyone wants or can afford to buy, why bother?

    The Chinese joint venture factories turned out to be applied, apprenticeships for the current and future Chinese auto manufacturers. But Tesla is teaching the Chinese a better way so legacy autos and their management practices are doomed.

    One caution for auto reviewers of pre-production cars like Hyundai’s IONIQ series. Even today, the IONIQ are not listed on the EPA site, Fueleconomy.gov. The term ‘vaporware’ comes to mind and hurts the reviewer’s credibility more than the laggard manufacturer. Reviewers might as well run articles about Fisker or Nicola vehicles.

  28. Norm T Says:

    Based on Edmund’s EV range test most EV’s the i7 295 miles will be on the low end and can see almost 20% more range in the real world testing is done on ix and i4.

    https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/electric-car-range-and-consumption-epa-vs-edmunds.html

  29. Lambo2015 Says:

    25 I agree that EVs really shine when it comes to the daily commute and if you have home charging. I also believe they have promise as fleet vehicles that stay within the range of the batteries. The battery swapping thing makes sense if you have 25+ of the same exact vehicle, maybe even less.
    Thats why I think the EV manufacturers that have locked up deals with Amazon or other large delivery companies to sell them EVs have a much better chance of making it. The stand alone luxury EV manufacturers have an up-hill battle ahead and unlike Tesla there are lots more options to choose from so they have a tough road ahead. No doubt we will see more EV manufacturers go belly up in the next few years. If I were running one of these start-ups Id make sure we had a fleet delivery vehicle and use that to help support some volume cause even a really nice EV isnt going to be enough to keep a company afloat. Think about Tesla. If they had stayed with just the model S, Tesla would be done by now. They needed the Y and 3 to make it. But all new start ups need either an amazing hit that sells like hot cakes or a few good offerings to make it now and thats going tomake it so much harder.

  30. Kit Gerhart Says:

    27 That’s strange that Ioniq 5 and 6 are not on the EPA site because they do, in fact, exist. There are a few in inventory, and I’ve seen a couple Ioniq 5s on the road.