Follow us on social media:
Runtime: 9:10
0:00 BYD Sues U.S.: Chinese OEM Challenges Trump Tariffs in Landmark Lawsuit
0:58 Supreme Court Tariff Ruling: Will BYD Win Its Legal Battle?
1:46 China’s Dreame Spends $10M On Super Bowl Ad, Features EV Hypercar
2:22 Canada Eyes Chinese EV Joint Venture: A Global Export Hub in The Making?
3:36 Nissan Pivots to PHEV: Plug-In Rogue and Frontier to Offset Slow EV Sales
4:14 Stellantis Backs Away from Battery Plants in Germany And Italy
4:53 Stellantis Sells Canadian Battery Stake to LG For Only $100
5:23 Xiaomi Slashes Miles-Driven to Unlock Hands-Free Driving
6:04 Mobis Working on Holographic Windshields: The Future of Navigation?
Visit our sponsors to thank them for their support of Autoline Daily: Bridgestone, CSP and Intrepid Control Systems.
This is Autoline Daily, the show dedicated to enthusiasts of the global automotive industry.
BYD SUES U.S.: CHINESE OEM CHALLENGES TRUMP TARIFFS IN LANDMARK LAWSUIT
Well, here’s an interesting development, to say the least. Chinese automaker BYD is suing the U.S. government, challenging the tariffs it imposed under the IEEPA, or the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The lawsuit is specifically targeted against Kristi Noem, the head of Homeland Security; Scott Bessent, the head of the U.S. Treasury; Jamieson Greer, the U.S. Trade Representative; and Rodney Scott, the head of U.S. Customs. The lawsuit targets 9 executive orders issued by the Trump Administration and specifically challenges tariffs targeting Canada, Mexico, Brazil and India. BYD has four subsidiaries in the United States that make electric buses, batteries, motors and provide services, and they’re the ones who have filed the lawsuit.
SUPREME COURT TARIFF RULING: WILL BYD WIN ITS LEGAL BATTLE?
Here’s our Autoline insight. BYD has a good chance of winning this lawsuit. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently evaluating the legality of the Trump Administration’s use of the IEEPA to impose tariffs. The act was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in 1977 to be used for extreme emergencies, like the outbreak of war. Many in the legal community believe that President Trump overstepped the boundaries of the law. But they also believe that if the Supreme Court rules against Trump, he will simply turn to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, and put those tariffs back in place. We won’t have to wait long to see how this is going to go. We’re expecting a ruling from the court in just a matter of weeks.
CHINA’S DREAME SPENDS $10M ON SUPER BOWL AD, FEATURES EV HYPERCAR
BYD isn’t the only Chinese automaker that wants to get into the U.S. market. We broke the story last month that Geely will make an announcement in the next couple of years to start making cars in South Carolina. And if you were watching the Super Bowl last night, maybe you caught this ad from Dreame, the Chinese company that makes everything from robot vacuums to lawn mowers, that also showed off its electric hypercar concept called Nebula. Dreame says it spent $10 million on the ad, and that car is featured throughout the 30-second spot.
CANADA EYES CHINESE EV JOINT VENTURE: A GLOBAL EXPORT HUB IN THE MAKING?
With the Trump Administration’s tariffs threatening the survival of the Canadian auto industry, Canada is actively pursuing car companies to build vehicles there. Last month, it signed a non-binding agreement with South Korea to bring Korean car manufacturing to Canada. And now Canada’s Industry Minister tells Bloomberg that it’s working to create a joint-venture with a Chinese company to produce EVs in Canada for global export. Canadian suppliers Magna, Linamar and Martinrea could participate in the joint-venture since they already have operations in China. The minister also believes the EVs can be cost competitive globally despite Canada’s higher labor prices. Canada is slowly warming up to Chinese automakers. Last month, it reached a deal to slash tariffs on Chinese EV imports from 100% down to just 6%.
NISSAN PIVOTS TO PHEV: PLUG-IN ROGUE AND FRONTIER TO OFFSET SLOW EV SALES
While Nissan is still committed to fully-electric vehicles, the automaker is moving to plug-in hybrids and extended range-electrics in the short-term because its BEV sales are softer than it expected. Nissan will launch a plug-in version of the Rogue in the U.S. this year with up to 42 miles of electric-only range. In China, it introduced an extended-range version of its NX8 3-row SUV with 115 miles of electric-only range. And for Europe, Nissan is considering importing a plug-in version of the Frontier pickup that’s built-in China and was co-developed with Dongfeng.
STELLANTIS BACKS AWAY FROM BATTERY PLANTS IN GERMANY AND ITALY
And speaking of rolling back EV plans, European battery maker ACC is shelving plans to open plants in Germany and Italy. ACC is a joint-venture between Stellantis, Mercedes and TotalEnergies, with Stellantis being the largest investor. The battery company was established in 2020 and planned to have three plants in Germany, Italy and France, each with a capacity to produce 8-GWh annually. But only the plant in France opened, which is currently making batteries for Stellantis. Production for Mercedes should start in the middle of this year.
STELLANTIS SELLS CANADIAN BATTERY STAKE TO LG FOR ONLY $100
And in related news, as we reported last week, Stellantis sold its stake in NextStar Energy to LG. NextStar Energy was a joint-venture between the two companies to build EV batteries in Canada. And Stellantis must have really wanted to get out of that partnership because Reuters reports it sold its 49% stake to LG for just $100. However, LG will continue to supply Stellantis with batteries produced at the plant.
XIAOMI SLASHES MILES-DRIVEN TO UNLOCK HANDS-FREE DRIVING
Xiaomi just lowered the threshold to unlock its city hands-free driving feature. Previously owners had to use the vehicle’s other driver assistance systems for 1,000 kilometers or about 620 miles before they got access to city hands-free driving. The idea was to gradually let people get used to its technology. But Xiaomi got so many complaints from owners that it took too long to unlock that it’s lowering the threshold to 300 kilometers or just over 185 miles. The change is part of the company’s most recent over-the-air update, so owners should be able to take advantage right away.
MOBIS WORKING ON HOLOGRAPHIC WINDSHIELDS: THE FUTURE OF NAVIGATION?
A piece of tech we find interesting just got a slightly better chance of making its way into a production model. A couple of years ago Hyundai Mobis, a giant supplier partly owned by the Hyundai Group, and German optics company Zeiss formed a partnership to develop holographic windshield displays. They hoped to start production as early as next year, but now they’ve signed on a couple of new partners and hope to start assembling units at scale before 2029. A company, called Tesa, will make the holographic films and glass supplier Saint-Gobain will integrate those films into the windshield. The holographic displays are brighter, offer better resolution and are smaller than traditional head-up displays. And with the ability to stretch across the entire windshield, we think there’s a number of features people would find interesting, especially turn-by-turn navigation.
But that brings us to the end of today’s show. Thanks for making Autoline a part of your day and a special thanks to all our YouTube and Patreon members.
Thanks to our partner for embedding Autoline Daily on its website: WardsAuto.com








The advantage Canada has in the auto industry is that we do not have any domestic OEMs. The industry is very important to our economy but with no dog in the fight we can be more open to all OEMs without needing to protect our local ones. Protection gets particularly difficult if the local OEM is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
I just read this about the rarely mentioned Kokomo, IN Stellantis/Samsung battery plant:
Operational Shifts: The Kokomo facility previously shifted to battery storage products in 2025 due to weak EV demand.
Best of luck to BYD. Their lawsuit will be tossed out due to jurisdiction. To attain jurisdiction they should have opened a USA headquarters, changed their legal address to the USA, established a factory, and….well….after all that they would not need to sue.
MERKUR, I don’t know about a “headquarters,” but BYD have had a bus factory in the US for years. As far as their law suits, I have no idea. I’m not a lawyer.
Nissan can pivot to PHEV or whatever they want but if they don’t kill the variable speed transmission it won’t really matter. There are dozens of you tube videos people have made of worst vehicles, and those transmissions put Nissan on the list almost every time.
Holographic windshield could be another distraction as bad as touch screens or even phones. Hopefully the information is really limited.
Regarding Nissan, back during the introduction of their Infiniti brand and during its heyday, the kind of modeled the.selves as a Asian Jaguar, with stylish models, especially their flagship Q sedan. Having lost their way and Jaguar moving upmarket, maybe now Infiniti/Nissan should try to recapture some of that mojo and lean heavier into that design/styling esthetic?! Since Jaguar will not be reachable for the ‘common’ luxury buyer, Infiniti could fill that void with shapely, powerful and intimate sedans and SUV/CUVs, that have more personality than the average Lexus. Their slightly tighter quarters may keep them from being the sells leaders, but attractive styling might keep them at the top of the ‘must have list’, selling way more vehicles then they do now.
How much will the holographic windshield be to replace? With the recalibrating of the safety systems attached to windshields as a result of a crack or chip, I would imagine that that type of technology might be expensive to replace.
I see no point in HUD or other things reflecting off windshields, but price of windshields? What difference does it make? I’ve been driving 62 years and have never replaced a windshield. These million dollar settlements for healthy people in lawyer ads are what is running up insurance costs.
I’m seeing these new “see the USA in your Chevrolet ads.” Who are they directed at? As an old person, I remember ads with that line when Chevy sold actual cars, other than just Corvette. Dinah Shore did ads with the ’55 Bel Air. Are they trying to sell trucks to aging boomers, or are they hoping these ads will work with younger truck and SUV buyers who never saw the 1950s ads?
Kit,
I think it is a continuation of their nostalgia series of ads. They roll out these nostalgia ads around every super bowl. Usually it is someone died and their chevrolet reminds everyone of the good times or daughter/son goes off to college in the old family chevrolet and they remember all the happy times. Something along those lines. I see these as an evolution of that series of nostalgia ads.
Was it BYD about 5-6 years ago, were building Electric Buses in California? They had charges of using SLAVE LABOR, Just like at home!! They brought their sweat shop tech to the USA !! Just the people and tech we need here, where is ICE NOWWWWW !